muninnhuginn: (Default)

I read El Reg's take on the "kerfuffle" (thanks to [livejournal.com profile] purplecthulhu for pointing it out) and had a sudden thought. (I'm assuming that the quotes from the TOS are precisely what was and is said.) So now, providing that they're clothed I could have a couple (hey, why not more? the more, the merrier, tho' there's not much room in 100 x 100 pixels) engaging in overt sexual acts so long as it's gentle? No areolae need be involved. And it all seems legit.

muninnhuginn: (Default)

Wasn't there a nifty tool out there somewhere that provided an image of all of one's friends using their (presumably default) icons?


If I wasn't dreaming it, and it still exists, what might it look like for folk where sufficient friends have, or have changed to, an allegedly obscene default icon?


As I said, all innocent like, I'm just curious?


Step Apart from SixApart on 06/06/06: Because breastfeeding is not indecent, but LiveJournal's treatment of breastfeeding mothers is.

Profile

muninnhuginn: (Default)
muninnhuginn

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 22nd, 2025 10:58 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios